Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 03:07

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Kroger faces massive worker walkout, closed stores - TheStreet
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Dementia: Switching to MIND diet even later in life can lower risk - Medical News Today
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
VMware drops the lowest tier of its partner program – except in Europe - theregister.com
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
This Genetic ‘Trick’ Helped the Black Death Linger for Centuries - Gizmodo
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
8 of the most controversial album covers of all time - dazeddigital.com
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Experts reveal that THIS diet can reduce heart disease risk - Times of India
Just in the last 5 years:
Let’s just make it real clear:
What’s next?
Citi Pounds the Table on Nvidia Stock, Citing Big Opportunity in Europe - TipRanks